EFFECTS OF PEER (GROUP) DISCUSSIONS ON L2 WRITING OF STUDENTS WITH AND WITHOUT LEARNING DIFFICULTIES (LD): IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING OF WRITING IN PAKISTAN

Authors

  • Ghulam HAIDER University of the Punjab Lahore, Pakistan

Abstract

Although a limited number of studies have been undertaken to support the argument that peer(Group) discussion facilitates L2 writing of students with and without learning difficulties(LD), few studies have provided statistical proof for this The present study was designed to compare the written work of two groups of Pakistani students, in order to identify the differences in writing outcomes achieved with different teaching methods: conducting peer(Group) discussions with the Experimental Group (EG) and teacher-dominance with the Control Group (CG). By comparing the two groups written products and analyzing the sample writings and questionnaire results, the study suggests that peer (Group) discussion facilitates students writing better than traditional classes, in terms of content, readership and thinking patterns.

Keywords: teaching of writing; peer (Group) discussion; English writing ability

REFERENCES

Ammon, P. 1985. Helping children learn to write in English as a second language: Some observations and some hypotheses. In S. W. Freedman (ed.). The acquisition of written language, pp. 65-84. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Bruffee, K A 1984. Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind”. College English 46:635—653.

Deng, Zhiyong. 2002. Teaching English writing: A socio-cognitive model. Modern Foreign Languages 4:4 08—417.

Ding, Wangdao etal. 1994. A Manualof English Writing. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press

Edelsky, C. 1982. Writing in a bilingual program: The relation of Li and L2 texts TESOL Quarterly 16, 211—228.

Flower, L. & J. R. Hayes. 1981. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and communication 32,A:365-387.

Gao, Yinghon. 2000. Understanding and Transcending Linguistic and Cultural Differences. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Gere, A. Ruggles &R. D. Abbott. 1985. Talking about writing: The language of writing groups. Research in the Teaching of English 4:362—379.

Hairston, M. 1992. Diversity, ideology, and teaching writing. College Composition and Communication 43, 4 179492.

Hiblenbrand, J. 1985. Carmen: A case study of an ESL writer. Unpublihed doctoral dissertation. Columbia University Teachers College.

Hinkel, E. 1999. Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kaplan, R. B. 2001. Forward: What in the world is contrastive rhetoric?In C. G. Panetta (ed.). Contrastive Rhetoric Revisited and Redefined. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publihers.

Kelly, L 1984. Toward competence and creativity in an open class. In R. L. Graves (ed.) Rhetoric and Composition: A Sourcebook for Teachers and Writers, pp. 49—65. New Jersey: Boynton Book Publihers, Inc.

Lefevre, K. 1987. Invention as a Social Act. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.

Li, Fagen. 1995. Textlinguistics, coherence and the teaching of writing. Journal of Heilongjiang University 3 60—65.

Ma, Guanghui. 2002. Contrastive analysis of linguistic features between L2 and ENL essays. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 9:345—49.

McCrimmon, J. R. 1970. “Writing as a way of knowing’ the promise of English. NCTE 1970 Distinguihed Lectures Urbana: NCTE, 1l5—30.

Omaggio, A C. 1986. Teaching Language in Contexts Boston, Mass.: Neinle and Leinle Pub. Inc.

Shi, Ling. 1998. Toward a recursive discourse: dynamics of talking to write in adult ESL classes. Modern Foreign Languages 1:25-0.

Vygosky, L 1962. Thought and Language. Cambridge: M/dpress.

Wang, Ping &Liu, Wenjie. 2001. Discrepancies of the oriental and occidental modes of thinking and EFI.J Writing. Foreign Language World 5:66-72.

Zamel, V. 1983. The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case studies. TESOL Quarterly 17 165.487.

Zhang, Zaixin, Wu, Hongyun, Wang, Xiaolu & Zhang, Junxiang. 1995. Some major problems in the teaching of L2 writing of students with and without learning difficulties(LD). Foreign Language Teaching and Research 4:43-49.

Zhao, Wei. 1989. A tentative Discussion on the corn municative Teaching of English Writing. Journal of the Second Foreign Languages Institute 3:60—65.

Zhao, Yongqing. 1995. From written discourse pattern to teaching of writing. Modern Foreign Languages 2 21-6.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-31

How to Cite

HAIDER, G. . (2013). EFFECTS OF PEER (GROUP) DISCUSSIONS ON L2 WRITING OF STUDENTS WITH AND WITHOUT LEARNING DIFFICULTIES (LD): IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING OF WRITING IN PAKISTAN. Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance & Counselling ISSN: 1300-7432, 2(2), 47–57. Retrieved from https://tijseg.org/index.php/tijseg/article/view/119

Issue

Section

Research Article