PERCIEVED INFLUENCE OF FACE-TO-FACE AND REMOTE INSTRUCTION ON LEARNING IN GAMBIAN UNIVERSITIES

Authors

Abstract

In compliance with laid down safety guidelines to contain the massive spread of COVID-19 in the Gambia, teaching and learning activities through the traditional face-to-face instructional mode in Gambian Universities have been disrupted. Subsequently, ICT‑driven remote instruction was adopted by most tertiary institutions. Despite this intervention, technical and internet-related problems have largely hampered the smooth delivery of lectures through the face-to-screen channel. This has dire implications for students' interest and attitude to learning. Therefore, this study examined face-to-face and face-to-screen modes of instruction as predictors of students' interest and attitude toward learning in Gambian Universities. Three research questions were raised and data were collected with ICT using online survey comprising 115 participants. The results showed that face-to-face instruction contributed more to students' interest and attitude toward learning than the face-to-screen mode. The study also found that students prefer the remote channel of instruction to the conventional face-to-face mode. Also, Gambian undergraduates perceived the influence of both face-to-face and face-to-screen instruction on their interest and attitude toward learning as positive. Therefore, it was recommended that the face-to-screen mode of instruction should be retained and progressively used alongside face-to-face instruction in conventional universities in post-COVID 19 Gambia.

Keywords: Face-to-face, remote instruction, interest, attitude, Gambian Universities.

REFERENCES

Aggarwal, J. C (2009). Principles, methods & techniques of teaching. India: Vikas Publishing House Pvt Ltd.

Awasthi, D. (2014). Utilizing audio-visual aids to make learning easy and effective in primary education. International Journal of Scientific Research, 3(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.15373/22778179/August2014/21

Beard, L. A., & Harper C. (2002). Student perceptions of online versus on campus instruction. Education, 122, 658-663.

DeCarvalho, R. (1991). The humanistic paradigm in education. The Humanistic Psychologist, 19(1), 88-104.

Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with online courses: Principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2), 7-41.

Ghazi-Saidi, L., Criffield, A., Kracl, C. L., Mckelvey, M., Obasi, S. N., & Vu, P. (2020). Moving from face-to-face to remote instruction in a higher education during a pandemic: Multiple case studies. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 4(4), 370-383.

Karl, L. W., Shahnaz, A., Erol, O., Masao, K., & Tabrizi, M. H. N. (2008). Pedagogical Characteristics of Online and Face-to-Face Classes. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(3), 523-532.

Mishra, S. K. & Yadav, B. (2004). Audio-visual aids and the secondary school teaching. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 15(2), 87-94.

Mpungose, C. B. (2020). Emergent transition from face-to-face to online learning in South African University in the context of the Coronavirus pandemic. Humanities and Social sciences Communication 7, 113.

Ogunleye, B. O., & Babajide, V. F. T. (2011). Generative Instructional Strategy enhances senior secondary school students’ achievement in physics. European Journal of Educational Studies, 3(3), 29-35.

Ogunyemi, K. O., & Olagbaju, O. O. (2020). Effects of Assertive and Aggressive Communication Styles on Students’ Self-Esteem and Achievement in English Language. Cross-Cultural Communication, 16(1), 96-101.

Olagbaju, O. O., & Popoola, A. G. (2020). Effects of audio-visual social media resources-supported instruction on learning outcomes in reading. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 3(2), 92-104.

Shah, I., & Khan, M. (2015).Impact of multimedia-aided teaching on students’ academic achievement and attitude at elementary level. US-China Education Review A, 5(5), 349–360

Tesser, A. (1993). The importance of heritability in psychological research: The case of attitudes. Psychological Review, 100, 129-142.

Vamosi, A. R., Pierce, B. G., & Slotkin, M. H. (2004). Distance learning in an accounting principles course: Student satisfaction and perceptions of efficacy. Journal of Education for Business, 79, 360-366.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The development of scientific concepts in childhood. The collected works of LS Vygotsky1, 167-241.

White, S. E. (1999). The effectiveness of web-based instruction: A case study. Paper presented at the Joint Meeting of the Central States Communication Association and the Southern States Communication Association, St. Louis, MO. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430261)

Wisan, G., Nazma, S., & Pscherer Jr, C. P. (2001). Comparing Online and Face-to-Face Instruction at a Large Virtual University: Data and Issues in the Measurement of Quality. AIR 2001 Annual Forum Paper. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Long Beach, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED456790).

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

OLAGBAJU, O. O. ., & AYEDUN, G. S. . (2021). PERCIEVED INFLUENCE OF FACE-TO-FACE AND REMOTE INSTRUCTION ON LEARNING IN GAMBIAN UNIVERSITIES. Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance & Counselling ISSN: 1300-7432, 10(1), 10–20. Retrieved from http://tijseg.org/index.php/tijseg/article/view/2

Issue

Section

Research Article