• Onur Emre Kocaoz Aksaray University, Faculty of Education, Department of Special Education, Aksaray/ Turkey


The impact of mathematic difficulties level varied for each individual from mild to severe.  Having math difficulties potentially impact the individual’s school, work, and personal life. To close the mathematic performance gap between students with and without LD requires accounting for students’ learning needs in order to maximize the use of effective mathematic instructional strategies. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of effective math interventions on the mathematical word problem-solving skills for students with LD

Key Words: Learning disabilities, mathematic, computer-assisted instruction


Apple, (2013). Apple Awarded 30 million ipad deal from La unified school districts. Retrieved from  http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2013/06/19Apple-Awarded-30-Million-iPad-Deal-From-LA-Unified-School-District.html

Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press

Aud, S., Hussar, W., Kena, G., Bianco, K., Frohlich, L., Kemp, J., Tahan, K. (2011). The Condition of Education 2011 (NCES 2011-033). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

Berson, M. J., &Balyta, P. (2004). Technological thinking and practice in the social studies:  Transcending the tumultuous adolescence of reform. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 20(4), 141-150.

Bjerede, M. & Bondi, T. (2012). Learning is personal: Stories of android tablet use in the 5th grade. Retrieved from http://www.learninguntethered.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Learning-is-Personal.pdf

Bouck, E. C., Bassette, L., Taber-Doughty, T., Flanagan, S. M., &Szwed, K. (2009). Pentop computers as tools for teaching multiplication to students with mild intellectual disabilities. Education & Training in Developmental Disabilities44(3), 367-380.

Cihak, D. F., &Bowlin, T. (2009). Using video modeling via handheld computers to improve geometry skills for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology24(4), 17-29.

Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with  mathematics disabilities with and without comorbid reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 564-574.

Fuchs, L. S., Seethaler, P. M., Powell, S. R., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Effects of preventative tutoring on the mathematical problem solving of third-grade students with math and reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 74, 155-173.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. ( 2004) . Regulations: Part 300/A/300. 8/ Retrieved from http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/,root,regs,300,A,300%252E8

Garnett, K. (1998). Math learning disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.ldonline.org/article/Math_Learning_Disabilities

Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C. C., McGoey, K., Gardill, M. C., Bhat, P., & Riley, T. (1998). Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(6), 345–355.

Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4-15.

Hannafin, R. D., &Foshay, W. R. (2008, April). Computer-based instruction’s (CBI) rediscovered role in K-12: An evaluation case study of one high school’s use of CBI to improve pass rates on high-stakes tests. Educational Technology Research & Development, 56(2), 147-160.

Henderson, S., &Yeow, J. (2012). iPad in education: A case study of iPad adoption and use in a primary school. In System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 78-87). IEEE

Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs. Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 97-114.

Leong, C. K., &Jerred, W. D. (2001). Effects of consistency and adequacy of language information on understanding elementary mathematics word problems. Annals of Dyslexia, 51(1), 275-298.

Little, M. E. (2009). Teaching mathematics: Issues and solutions. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus6(1), 1-15.

Little, M. E.,&Delisio L. (2015). Current Practice Alerts: A focus on Explicit Instruction in Mathematics. Council for Exceptional Children’s Division for Learning Disabilities and Division for Research. Retrieved fromhttp://s3.amazonaws.com/cmi-teaching-ld/alerts/27/uploaded_files/original_DLD_Alert23_rev1.pdf?1438596491

Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Myers, G. F. (2003). Complexities in identifying and defining mathematics learning disability in the primary school-age years. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 218-253.

Miles, C. (2000). Developmental mathematics traditions and alternatives: An interview with Bob Hackworth. Journal of Developmental Education, 23(3), 20-23.

Montague, M., & Applegate, B. (1993). Middle school students’ mathematical problem solving: An analysis of think-aloud protocols. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16(1), 19-32.

National Center for Educational Statistics. (2011). The Nation’s Report Card: Mathematics 2011.  Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from  http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/2012458.pdf

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2013). Common core mathematics. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf

No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001, Pub.L. No. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 1000 et seq. (2002).

Nordness, P. D., Haverkost, A., &Volberding, A. (2011). An examination of hand-held computer-assisted instruction on subtraction skills for second grade students with learning and behavioral disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology26(4), 15-24.

O’Malley, P., Jenkins, S., Wesley, B., Donehower, C., Rabuck, D. &Lewis, M. E. B. (2013). Effectiveness of using ipads to build math fluency, Online Submission. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541158. pdf.

Parmar, R. S., Cawley, J. F., &Frazita, R. R. (1996). Word problem-solving by students with and without mild disabilities. Exceptional Children, 62, 415-429.

Russell, M., Bebell. D., Cowan, J., &Corbelli, M. (2003). An AlphaSmart for each student: Do teaching and learning change with full access to word processors? Computers and Composition, 20, 51-76.

Saine, P. (2012). iPods, iPads, and the smartboard: transforming literacy instruction and student learning. The Nera Journal. 47(2), 74-79.

Tournaki, N. (2003). The differential effects of teaching addition through strategy instruction versus drill and practice to students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(5), 449–458.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2005). Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics programs and related trends [GAO-06-114]. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06114.pdf

Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Swets and Zeitlinger: Lisse.

Wilson, C. L. &Sindelar, P. T. (1991). Direct instruction in math word problems: Students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 57, 512-518

Xin, Y. P., &Jitendra, A. K. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems a meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education32(4), 207-225.




How to Cite

Kocaoz , O. E. . (2016). EFFECTIVE MATHEMATIC INSTRUCTION STRATEGIES FOR STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES MATHEMATIC DIFFICULTIES. Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance & Counselling ISSN: 1300-7432, 5(1), 46–51. Retrieved from https://tijseg.org/index.php/tijseg/article/view/64



Research Article