¬TEACHERS’ THOUGHTS AND ACTIONS WITHIN GENERAL EDUCATION SETTINGS REGARDING INCLUSION IN TURKEY

Authors

  • Orhan SIMSEK University of South Florida, USA
  • Mucahit KOCAK University of South Florida, USA

Abstract

Even though Turkish Ministry of Education (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB], 2006) accept the philosophy of inclusion and made huge shift in terms of this philosophy, inclusion has still not common yet in Turkey and that the required and expected levels of individual and social benefits have not been obtained (Sari, Celikoz, & Secer, 2009). Therefore, teachers’ concern about inclusion is wondered. The purpose of this case study is to describe the attitudes of general education teachers’ towards inclusion for students with disabilities and to understand the effectiveness of inclusion in classroom settings, in Turkey. Qualitative research method was used in this study. The research was done as a Case Study. Participants of this study are four general education teachers, two of them are working at elementary and other two are at secondary level. Even though inclusion is promising benefit for all students, the research showed that indeed, inclusion in Turkey is not working effectively because of several reasons, such as lack of professional development programs and inefficacy of existing programs for general education teachers and psychologist working in Guidance Research Center (RAM), lack of resource, lack of collaboration between teachers-psychologists, and teachers-family. Most critical finding is violation of inclusion rules.

Keywords: Teachers, Education, Turkey

REFERENCES

Alquraini, T. A. (2012). Factors Related to Teachers' Attitudes towards the Inclusive Education of Students with Severe Intellectual Disabilities in Riyadh, Saudi. Journal Of Research In Special Educational Needs, 12(3), 170-182.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006).Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research In Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Brownell, M. T., Ross, D. D., Colón, E. P., & McCallum, C. L. (2005). Critical Features of Special Education Teacher Preparation A Comparison With General Teacher Education. The Journal of Special Education, 38(4), 242-252.

Brownell, M. T., Sindelar, P. T., Kiely, M. T., & Danielson, L. C. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 357-377.

Casale-Giannola, D. (2012). Comparing Inclusion in The Secondary Vocational and Academic Classrooms: Strengths, Needs, and Recommendations. American Secondary Education, 40(2), 26-42.

Combs, S., Elliott, S., & Whipple, K. (2010). Elementary Physical Education Teachers' Attitudes towards the Inclusion of Children with Special Needs: A Qualitative Investigation. International Journal of Special Education, 25(1), 114-125.

Darling-Hammond, L., (2010).Teacher Education and the American Future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 35-47.

Grigorenko, E. L. (2008). Educating individuals with disabilities: IDEIA 2004 and beyond. Springer Pub.

MilliEğitimBakanlığı. (2006). ÖzelEğitimHizmetleriYönetmeliği (madde 4). Ankara: The Ministry of National Education Publications.

Moats, L. C., &Foorman, B. R., (2003).Measuring Teachers’ Content Knowledge of Language and Reading.Annals of Dyslexia, 5323-45.

National Center for Education Statistics (1999). Teacher quality: A report on the preparedness and qualifications of public school teachers. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education.

Paulston, R. G. (1991). Comparing Ways of Knowing across Inquiry Communities: Implications for Comparative Education.

Rosenfield, S. A., &Berninger, V. W. (2009).Implementing evidence-based academic interventions in school settings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rowan, B., Correnti, R., Miller, J., & Consortium for Policy Research in Education, P.A. (2002).What Large-Scale, Survey Research Tells Us about Teacher Effects on Student Achievement: Insight from the “Prospects” Study of Elementary Schools. CPRE Research Report Series.

Sari, H., Celikoz, N., &Secer, Z. (2009).An analysis of pre-school teachers' and student teachers' attitudes to inclusion and their self-efficacy. International Journal of Special Education, 24(3), 29-44.

Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study evaluations: a decade of progress?.In Evaluation Models (pp. 185-193).Springer Netherlands.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-30

How to Cite

SIMSEK , O. ., & KOCAK, M. . (2014). ¬TEACHERS’ THOUGHTS AND ACTIONS WITHIN GENERAL EDUCATION SETTINGS REGARDING INCLUSION IN TURKEY. Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance & Counselling ISSN: 1300-7432, 3(1), 13–21. Retrieved from https://tijseg.org/index.php/tijseg/article/view/92

Issue

Section

Research Article