PERCEPTION OF STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DIFFICULTIES TOWARDS ENGLISH COMPOSITION WRITING THROUGH ACTIVITIES

Abstract

Politzers (1972) says that English composition writing products must consist of spoken discourse. The author of this paper holds that speaking is likely to be in the union of reading in its contribution to better English composition writing. Investigation of the perceptions of students with LD reveals their strong wish to improve English composition writing and classroom atmosphere 113 students with LD were involved in a series of classroom activities forming the preparing stage for English composition writing. The variety of activities offers a large platform for the participants to share opinions and exchange information. The investigations of the perceptions of students with LD carried out during the program towards each activity show their preferences concerning elective subjects.

Keywords: Students with LD needs, English composition writing, classroom activities, attitudes

REFERENCES

Breen M.P A Littlejohn eds (2002).Classroom Decision making Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Els T V etal (1984).Applied Linguistics and the Learning and Teaching of Foreign Language. Translated by R. R Van Oirsouw Edward Arnold.

Haider, G. (2012). " Teaching of Writing in Pakistan: A Review of Major Pedagogical Trends and Issues in Teaching of Writing, Journal of Educational and Social Research,2,(3),215-226         

Haider, G. (2012). “Process Approach in Writing: Issues and Implications for Teaching in Pakistan, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2 (2),147-150

Haider, G. (2012). An investigation of problems faced by L1 (Urdu) 5th grade Hearing  Impaired students in Urdu written expression: Implications for Teaching of L1 (Urdu)”, Academic Journal of  Interdisciplinary Studies, 1, (02), 253-265

Haider, G. (2012)." An Investigation of Pakistani L2 HI Writers’ Perceptions of Previous Writing Experience in L2: Implications for Literacy Development in Pakistan for HIC”, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,3,(11), 221-234

Haider, G. (2012).What the Pakistani L2 Writers Do When They Write An Investigation of the Composing Processes of Pakistani L2 Writers” ,Academic Journal of  Interdisciplinary Studies, 1, (02), 171-180

Haider, G. (2013). Cognitive Discourse Analysis   of L2Writer’s ‘Think-Aloud Protocol: A Case Study. Language In India, 13:11, 591-606.

Haider, G. (2013)."Self-Accessed and Self Regulatory Practices in  Teaching of Writing  In Pakistan" European Journal of Educational Sciences,1,(1),53-61

Haider, G. (2013).Perceptions of ESL Teachers towards CALL:Implications for ELT(English Language Teaching) at the Intermediate Level-A Case Study from Pakistan. Language In India,13:8, 204-238.

Haider, G. (In Press). A Brief Review of Writing Processes in the Light of the Holy Quran. Language In India

Haider, G. (In Press). A Comparison of English and Urdu Organizational Patterns in Argumentative Writing of Pakistani EFL Students Internatiional Journal of  English and Education (ISSN2278-4012)

Haider, G. (In Press). Analysis of Malala Yousaf Zai’s Speech: Application of Aristotle’s Ethos, Pathos and Logos. International Journal of English and Education (ISSN2278-4012)

Haider, G. (2013). The Effects of Peer (Group) Discussion on L2(English) composition of Students with Learning Difficulties (LD)and Students without Learning Difficulties  (LD Implications for Teaching of Writing in Pakistan. Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance & Counseling (TIJSEG)

Haider, G. (In Press).An Exploratory Study of Organizational Problems Fcedby Student writers in Expository L2(English) compositionin Pakistan. International Journal of English and Education (ISSN2278-4012)

Haider,G.(InPress).Attribution Theory and L2(English) composition Processes: Results and Implications. Nepal English, Language Teachers’  Association(NELTA)

Hayes, J. R. and Flower, L. 1983. "Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: an introduction to protocol analysis". In Mosenthal, P., Tamor, L. and Walmsley, S. (eds). 1983. 207-20. House Ltd. Tokyo

Hyland. K.(2003). Genre Based Pedagogies. A Social Response to Process Journal of Second LanguageEnglish composition writing. 12 17 29.

Johns A. M. (1990). L1 Composition Theories Implications for Developing Theories of L2 Composition. In B Kroll Ed. Second LanguageEnglish composition writing Research Insights for the Classroom pp. 24 36 New York NY Cambridge University Press.

Krapels A. R. (1990). An Overview of Second writing Process Research. In B Kroll Ed. Second Language writing Research Insights for the Classroom pp. 37 56 New York NY Cambridge University Press.

Leki I. (1992). Understanding ESL Writers. A Guide for Teachers Portsmouth NH Boynton Cook Publishers Heinemann.

Linder  P. (2002). Is a Negotiated Syllabus Feasible within a National Curriculum in M. P Breen A Littlejohn eds Classroom Decision making pp. 94 107 Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Matsuda P. K. (2003). Process and Post Process A Discursive History. Journal of Second Language writing 12 63 85 29.

Mclean P. (1990).English composition writing for and Against Macmillan Language Haider, G. (2012). " An Insight into Difficulties Faced By Pakistani Student   Writers: Implications for Teaching of    Writing, Journal of Educational and  Social Research, 2(3),17-28

Raimes A (1983). Techniques in TeachingEnglish composition writing New York NY Oxford University Press.

Raimes A. (1989). Exploring through writing a Process Approach to ESLEnglish composition writing N Y St. Martin’s Press

Reid J. (1993). Teaching ESL writing Englewood Cliffs NJ Prentice Hall Regents.

Reppen R. (2001). A genre based approach to contentEnglish composition writing instruction in J. C. Richards W. A Renadna Eds Methodology in Language Teaching. An Anthology of Current Practice pp. 321 326. New York Cambridge University Press.

Richards J.C T.S Rogers (2000). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching Beijing Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Seow A. (2002). TheEnglish composition writing Process and Process writing in J. C Richards W. A Renanda Eds. Methodology in Language Teaching An Anthology of Current Practice pp. 315 320. New York Cambridge University Press.

Silva T. (2000). Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2English composition writing the ESL research and its implications in T. Silva P. K Matsuda Eds Landmark Essays on ESL writing pp. 191 208 Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.

Silva T. P. K. Matsuda Eds (2000). Landmark Essays on ESL writing Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.

Skehan P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford University Press.

Spolsky B. (2000). Conditions for Second Language Learning Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Ur. P. A Wright(1993). Five Minute Activities. A Source of Short Activities. Cambridge University Press. 1997

Zamel V. (1982).English composition writing the Process of Discovering Meaning TESOL Quarterly 16 2 195 209

Zamel V. (1987). Recent Research on writing Pedagogy TESOL Quarterly 21 4 697 715

Zamel V. (2000). Teaching Composition in the ESL Classroom What we can learn from research in the teaching of English In T. Silva P. K Matsuda Eds Landmark Essays on ESL writing pp. 27 36 Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.